2005 Audi TT vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,198 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 140 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (310 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Audi | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | TT | CLK |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3187 cc | 3198 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 310 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 62 L |