2005 Audi TT vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 235 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (235 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | TT | 75 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 235 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 228 km/hour | 213 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |