2005 Audi TT vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 16 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (321 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (195 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | TT | Condor |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2436 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 321 Nm | 195 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1646 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 70 L |