2005 Audi TT vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 1 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Toyota Condor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (235 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (158 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | TT | Condor |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 235 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1446 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |