2005 Audi TT vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2005 Audi TT. (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 205 kg more than 2005 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi TT. (235 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | TT | BLS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1786 cc | 2792 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 350 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 58 L |