2005 Audi TT vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd

To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2010 Kia Cee'd. (124 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Cee'd. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 80 kg more than 2010 Kia Cee'd. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (235 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Cee'd. (154 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Cee'd.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Audi TT 2010 Kia Cee'd
Make Audi Kia
Model TT Cee'd
Year Released 2005 2010
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1786 cc 1590 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 5 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 180 HP 124 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 235 Nm 154 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1355 kg 1275 kg
Vehicle Length 4050 mm 4260 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2660 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.8 L/100km 6.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 53 L