2005 Audi TT vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Audi TT. (250 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 408 kg more than 2005 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi TT. (320 Nm). This means 2012 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | TT | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3187 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1963 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5085 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2875 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 76 L |
