2005 Audi TT vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Audi TT (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 219 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ford C-MAX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (175 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | TT | C-MAX |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1784 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 139 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 12.3:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1754 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4409 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2085 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1621 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 2.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 2.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 53 L |
