2005 Audi TT vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi TT would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (345 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2005 Audi TT. (225 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 25 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Lotus Evora. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (400 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi TT. (281 Nm). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Audi | Lotus |
| Model | TT | Evora |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4361 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2575 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 14.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |
