2005 Audi TT vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi TT would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi TT weights approximately 150 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Countryman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi TT (281 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi TT | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Audi | Mini |
Model | TT | Countryman |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 47 L |