2005 Audi TT vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Audi TT would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 999 kg more than 2005 Audi TT.
Because 2005 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm) has 399 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi TT. (321 Nm). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi TT | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | TT | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 321 Nm | 720 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 84 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 2629 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5612 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1987 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1598 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3320 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 100 L |
