2005 Avanti Studebaker vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Avanti Studebaker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Avanti Studebaker would be higher. At 6,751 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Avanti Studebaker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2005 Avanti Studebaker. (307 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 2005 Avanti Studebaker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Avanti Studebaker weights approximately 62 kg more than 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Avanti Studebaker. (425 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Avanti Studebaker.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Avanti Studebaker | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | Avanti | Cadillac |
Model | Studebaker | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6751 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 307 HP | 397 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 425 Nm | 565 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2775 kg | 2713 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 5662 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1918 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3410 mm | 3302 mm |