2005 Bentley Arnage vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2005 Bentley Arnage is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 6,748 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bentley Arnage (451 HP @ 3250 RPM) has 425 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bentley Arnage should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Bentley Arnage weights approximately 1925 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Bentley Arnage | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Bentley | DAF |
| Model | Arnage | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6748 cc | 745 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 451 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2585 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5410 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3120 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 33 L |
