2005 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Bizzarrini BZ-2001. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 would be higher. At 6,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 (500 HP) has 186 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (314 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 753 kg more than 2005 Bizzarrini BZ-2001.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Bizzarrini BZ-2001. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Cadillac |
| Model | BZ-2001 | CTS |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 6900 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 314 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1953 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2160 mm | 1842 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2880 mm |
