2005 Bizzarrini GTS vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre 4
To start off, 2005 Bizzarrini GTS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre 4 would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Bizzarrini GTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bizzarrini GTS (523 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 453 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre 4. (70 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bizzarrini GTS should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre 4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Bizzarrini GTS (710 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 587 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Reliant Sabre 4. (123 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 Bizzarrini GTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Reliant Sabre 4.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Bizzarrini GTS | 1963 Reliant Sabre 4 | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Reliant |
Model | GTS | Sabre 4 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 4396 cc | 1703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 523 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 710 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2290 mm |