2005 Bizzarrini GTS vs. 2000 Citroen C3
To start off, 2005 Bizzarrini GTS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Bizzarrini GTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bizzarrini GTS (523 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 414 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (109 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bizzarrini GTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3.
Because 2005 Bizzarrini GTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Bizzarrini GTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Bizzarrini GTS (710 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 600 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Bizzarrini GTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Bizzarrini GTS | 2000 Citroen C3 | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Citroen |
| Model | GTS | C3 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 4396 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 523 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 710 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2760 mm |
