2005 Bizzarrini GTS vs. 2012 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XJ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Bizzarrini GTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Bizzarrini GTS would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bizzarrini GTS (523 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2012 Jaguar XJ. (510 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bizzarrini GTS should accelerate faster than 2012 Jaguar XJ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Bizzarrini GTS (710 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Jaguar XJ. (624 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Bizzarrini GTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Bizzarrini GTS | 2012 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Jaguar |
Model | GTS | XJ |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 4396 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 523 HP | 510 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 710 Nm | 624 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5127 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3032 mm |