2005 BMW 320 vs. 1966 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2005 BMW 320 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2005 BMW 320. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2005 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 565 kg more than 2005 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW 320 | 1966 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 320 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2171 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 82 L |
