2005 BMW 320 vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2005 BMW 320 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2005 BMW 320. (168 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2005 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 115 kg more than 2005 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW 320 | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 320 | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2171 cc | 6550 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 213 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2960 mm |
