2005 BMW 320 vs. 1972 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2005 BMW 320 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW 320 (168 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1972 Mercury Cougar. (167 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1972 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 186 kg more than 2005 BMW 320.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mercury Cougar (363 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 BMW 320. (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1972 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 BMW 320.

Compare all specifications:

2005 BMW 320 1972 Mercury Cougar
Make BMW Mercury
Model 320 Cougar
Year Released 2005 1972
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2171 cc 5769 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 168 HP 167 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 363 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 2400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1470 kg 1656 kg
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1920 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2860 mm