2005 BMW 320 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2005 BMW 320 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW 320 (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW 320 weights approximately 145 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW 320 (340 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2005 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW 320 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 320 | CU-X |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |