2005 BMW 325 vs. 1958 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2005 BMW 325 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Sixty (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2005 BMW 325. (184 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2005 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 595 kg more than 2005 BMW 325. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW 325 | 1958 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 325 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2494 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 184 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 2235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3390 mm |
