2005 BMW 325 vs. 2002 Ford Ka
To start off, 2005 BMW 325 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ka would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW 325 (190 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW 325 weights approximately 494 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW 325 (237 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ka. (175 Nm). This means 2005 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW 325 | 2002 Ford Ka | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 325 | Ka |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1136 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 42 L |