2005 BMW 325 vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW 325 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-150 (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2005 BMW 325. (184 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2005 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-150 weights approximately 390 kg more than 2005 BMW 325. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-150 (339 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 BMW 325. (237 Nm). This means 2010 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW 325 | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 325 | E-150 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 339 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 72 L |