2005 BMW 325 vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW 325 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2005 BMW 325. (189 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2005 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 124 kg more than 2005 BMW 325. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 BMW 325. (237 Nm). This means 2011 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 BMW 325.

Compare all specifications:

2005 BMW 325 2011 Cadillac CTS
Make BMW Cadillac
Model 325 CTS
Year Released 2005 2011
Body Type Convertible Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2494 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 189 HP 270 HP
Engine RPM 7400 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 237 Nm 302 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 1744 kg
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 4859 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1473 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.7 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 12.4 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 68 L