2005 BMW 330 vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW 330. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW 330 would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW 330 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW 330 (215 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2013 Jeep Compass. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW 330 should accelerate faster than 2013 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW 330 weights approximately 17 kg more than 2013 Jeep Compass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW 330 (290 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Compass. (224 Nm). This means 2005 BMW 330 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW 330 | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 330 | Compass |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 224 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 97 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1473 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 51 L |