2005 BMW 520 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2005 BMW 520 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,171 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW 520 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW 520 weights approximately 900 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW 520 (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW 520 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | 520 | 102 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2171 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2160 mm |