2005 BMW 525 vs. 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2005 BMW 525 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 464 kg more than 2005 BMW 525.
Because 2005 BMW 525 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW 525 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW 525 | 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | BMW | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 525 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 232 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1686 kg | 2150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 107 L |
