2005 BMW 525 vs. 2000 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2005 BMW 525 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 290 kg more than 2005 BMW 525.
Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 BMW 525. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (442 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 BMW 525. (250 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 BMW 525.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW 525 | 2000 GMC Yukon | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | 525 | Yukon |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 250 Nm | 442 Nm |
Top Speed | 237 km/hour | 177 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2990 mm |