2005 BMW 525 vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2005 BMW 525 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW 525 (215 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (211 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW 525 should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 177 kg more than 2005 BMW 525.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 BMW 525. (250 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 BMW 525.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW 525 | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 525 | Dakota |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.8 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1747 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3330 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.9 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.4 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 76 L |