2005 BMW 530 vs. 1963 NSU 1000 LS

To start off, 2005 BMW 530 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 LS would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW 530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW 530 (269 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (42 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW 530 weights approximately 995 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW 530 (571 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 501 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (70 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. 2005 BMW 530 has automatic transmission and 1963 NSU 1000 LS has manual transmission. 1963 NSU 1000 LS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 BMW 530 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 BMW 530 1963 NSU 1000 LS
Make BMW NSU
Model 530 1000 LS
Year Released 2005 1963
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 2993 cc 996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 269 HP 42 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 571 Nm 70 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 69 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 66.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 8.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1615 kg 620 kg
Vehicle Length 4850 mm 3790 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1490 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2260 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 34 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]