2005 BMW 530 vs. 2001 Toyota Celica

To start off, 2005 BMW 530 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW 530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW 530 (269 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Celica. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW 530 weights approximately 496 kg more than 2001 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 BMW 530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 BMW 530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW 530 (571 Nm) has 391 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Celica. (180 Nm). This means 2005 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Celica. 2005 BMW 530 has automatic transmission and 2001 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 2001 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 BMW 530 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 BMW 530 2001 Toyota Celica
Make BMW Toyota
Model 530 Celica
Year Released 2005 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2993 cc 1797 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 269 HP 190 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 571 Nm 180 Nm
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 82 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 85.1 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 11.5:1
Top Speed 225 km/hour 225 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1615 kg 1119 kg
Vehicle Length 4850 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2510 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 45 L