2005 BMW 530 vs. 2003 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2005 BMW 530 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW 530 (254 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 565 kg more than 2005 BMW 530.
Because 2005 BMW 530 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW 530 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 BMW 530. (300 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 BMW 530.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW 530 | 2003 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 530 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3510 mm |