2005 BMW 530 vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW 530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW 530 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW 530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW 530 (254 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3.
Because 2005 BMW 530 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 BMW 530 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW 530 (300 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW 530 | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 530 | 3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |