2005 BMW 730 vs. 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser
To start off, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW 730. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW 730 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW 730 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW 730 (225 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (178 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW 730 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Because 2005 BMW 730 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 BMW 730. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW 730 (500 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 2005 BMW 730 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW 730 | 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | |
| Make | BMW | Chrysler |
| Model | 730 | PT Dream Cruiser |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 2397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 178 HP |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 101 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2000 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 6.4 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
