2005 BMW 730 vs. 2010 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2010 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW 730. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW 730 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW 730 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW 730 (225 HP) has 77 more horse power than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW 730 should accelerate faster than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2005 BMW 730 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 BMW 730. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW 730 (500 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa. (320 Nm). This means 2005 BMW 730 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daewoo Tocsa.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW 730 | 2010 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | BMW | Daewoo |
| Model | 730 | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 500 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.2 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
