2005 BMW 760 vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW 760. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW 760 would be higher. At 6,129 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 BMW 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW 760 (438 HP) has 78 more horse power than 2012 Holden Commodore. (360 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW 760 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW 760 (602 Nm) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2005 BMW 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore. 2005 BMW 760 has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 BMW 760 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW 760 | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 760 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6129 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 438 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 602 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.4 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |