2005 BMW FW 27 vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 2005 BMW FW 27 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Dodge Polara weights approximately 925 kg more than 2005 BMW FW 27.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW FW 27 | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | FW 27 | Polara |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 5905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 301 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 960 mm | 1420 mm |