2005 BMW FW 27 vs. 1962 Mini MK I
To start off, 2005 BMW FW 27 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 BMW FW 27 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Mini MK I weights approximately 15 kg more than 2005 BMW FW 27.
Because 2005 BMW FW 27 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 BMW FW 27. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW FW 27 | 1962 Mini MK I | |
| Make | BMW | Mini |
| Model | FW 27 | MK I |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 960 mm | 1360 mm |
