2005 BMW FW 27 vs. 2000 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 BMW FW 27 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 2,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 BMW FW 27 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 830 kg more than 2005 BMW FW 27.
Because 2000 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 BMW FW 27. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW FW 27 | 2000 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | FW 27 | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2464 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 960 mm | 1640 mm |
