2005 BMW FW 27 vs. 2003 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2005 BMW FW 27 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 BMW FW 27 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW FW 27 | 2003 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | FW 27 | Tracker |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 97 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 960 mm | 1700 mm |