2005 BMW FW 27 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2005 BMW FW 27 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1116 kg more than 2005 BMW FW 27.
Because 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 BMW FW 27. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW FW 27 | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | FW 27 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 195 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 960 mm | 1770 mm |