2005 BMW FW 27 vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 BMW FW 27 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1915 kg more than 2005 BMW FW 27.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 BMW FW 27. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW FW 27 | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | BMW | Land Rover |
| Model | FW 27 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 4396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 2515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 960 mm | 1870 mm |
