2005 BMW FW 27 vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 BMW FW 27 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 BMW FW 27 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 915 kg more than 2005 BMW FW 27.
Because 2003 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 BMW FW 27. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW FW 27 | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | FW 27 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 960 mm | 1760 mm |