2005 BMW FW 27 vs. 2009 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW FW 27. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW FW 27 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 BMW FW 27 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 1443 kg more than 2005 BMW FW 27.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 BMW FW 27. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW FW 27 | 2009 Jeep Compass | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | FW 27 | Compass |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 172 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 2043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 960 mm | 1660 mm |