2005 BMW FW 27 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW FW 27. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW FW 27 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 BMW FW 27 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 959 kg more than 2005 BMW FW 27.
Because 2005 BMW FW 27 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 BMW FW 27. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW FW 27 | 2010 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | FW 27 | Malibu |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 169 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1559 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4872 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 960 mm | 1450 mm |
