2005 BMW FW 27 vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW FW 27. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW FW 27 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 2025 kg more than 2005 BMW FW 27.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW FW 27 | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | FW 27 | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 397 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 2625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5662 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 960 mm | 1918 mm |