2005 BMW FW 27 vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW FW 27. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW FW 27 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo S60 weights approximately 1162 kg more than 2005 BMW FW 27.
Because 2013 Volvo S60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 BMW FW 27. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 BMW FW 27 | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | FW 27 | S60 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | W |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 321 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1762 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2097 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 960 mm | 1484 mm |
