2005 BMW M3 vs. 1953 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2005 BMW M3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,244 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW M3 (320 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW M3 weights approximately 574 kg more than 1953 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW M3 (337 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm). This means 2005 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW M3 | 1953 Jeep CJ | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | M3 | CJ |
Year Released | 2005 | 1953 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3244 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 337 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2040 mm |