2005 BMW M3 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 BMW M3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,244 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW M3 (320 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW M3 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW M3 (337 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2005 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW M3 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | BMW | Triumph |
Model | M3 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3244 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 337 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |